Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,666,150 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from North America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.376. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.166% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North America corresponds to a decrease of 165.5 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,860 compared to $99,933, a difference of 8.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,407 compared to $110,787, a difference of 8.2%), and median female earnings ($41,319 compared to $44,198, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($49,302 compared to $49,741, a difference of 0.89%), householder income over 65 years ($64,856 compared to $67,594, a difference of 4.2%), and median male earnings ($60,265 compared to $63,240, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.2%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.38%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 14.1%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.030%), currently married (48.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 47.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.0% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.9%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.6%).