Navajo vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,895,524 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $49,741, a difference of 71.3%), median household income ($59,159 compared to $99,933, a difference of 68.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $116,566, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 20.6%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $56,379, a difference of 33.0%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $44,198, a difference of 33.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 144.8%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 136.8%), and single male poverty (25.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 122.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 52.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 58.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 63.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 110.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 104.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 99.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 92.2%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 57.8%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and average family size (3.65 compared to 3.27, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.3%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 95.3%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 91.6%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 87.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.11%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and 5th grade (97.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 68.8%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.0%).