Immigrants from Lebanon vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,141,416 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.792% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to an increase of 792.3 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $56,379, a difference of 11.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,124 compared to $110,787, a difference of 9.6%), and median household income ($91,887 compared to $99,933, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($64,521 compared to $67,594, a difference of 4.8%), and per capita income ($46,938 compared to $49,741, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 35.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 5.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.15%), married-couple households (48.9% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and family households (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 28.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.0%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.14%), 5th grade (97.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and ged/equivalency (86.8% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.2%).