Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 373,650,470 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.602. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.216% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 216.3 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $63,240, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $110,787, a difference of 36.2%), and median family income ($87,191 compared to $118,291, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $56,379, a difference of 9.6%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $44,198, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 56.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 55.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 12.5%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.9%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.4%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 39.9%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 0.070%), family households (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 5.4%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.45%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 74.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 59.9%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 58.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.7%).