Latvian vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,005,637 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.139% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 139.1 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $56,379, a difference of 6.8%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $49,741, a difference of 5.9%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $67,594, a difference of 0.40%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $63,240, a difference of 0.41%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $116,566, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.77%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 9.0%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.39%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.18%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 56.9%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 23.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.91%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%).