Cuban vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 442,833,766 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.668. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.039% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 38.8 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($84,981 compared to $118,291, a difference of 39.2%), householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $67,594, a difference of 37.5%), and median household income ($73,392 compared to $99,933, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $56,379, a difference of 11.3%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $44,198, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 84.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 52.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.0%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 47.0%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.1%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.56%), family households (67.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 27.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.090%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 76.2%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 52.5%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.85%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.7%).