Immigrants from Barbados vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,660,299 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Barbados communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Barbados within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.878% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Barbados corresponds to a decrease of 877.8 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (17.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 51.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,394 compared to $116,566, a difference of 30.4%), and median family income ($92,419 compared to $118,291, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,685 compared to $44,198, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,163 compared to $56,379, a difference of 6.0%), and median earnings ($45,816 compared to $53,310, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 68.0%), family poverty (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.7%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 41.2%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.7% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.3%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 37.4%), and married-couple households (39.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and family households (63.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 171.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 87.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 26.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.8% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 57.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 72.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 64.5%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.2%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 19.7%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.9%).