Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,907,824 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.646. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.050% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 50.2 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($78,249 compared to $118,291, a difference of 51.2%), householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $67,594, a difference of 51.1%), and median household income ($68,461 compared to $99,933, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $56,379, a difference of 11.9%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $44,198, a difference of 32.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 110.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 69.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.1%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and male unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 54.8%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 41.9%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.18%), family households (68.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 106.2%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 69.7%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.5%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.1%).