Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,232,858 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.277. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.180% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 179.9 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $63,240, a difference of 16.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $110,787, a difference of 15.9%), and median household income ($87,262 compared to $99,933, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $56,379, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $67,594, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.82%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 22.1%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.39%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 7th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.29%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%).