Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 479,988,187 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.073% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to a decrease of 73.4 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,042 compared to $110,787, a difference of 17.8%), median family income ($100,414 compared to $118,291, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,126 compared to $116,566, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,268 compared to $56,379, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and median female earnings ($39,643 compared to $44,198, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.6%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.34%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 19.3%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.090%), family households (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.54%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.0%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.040%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.82%).