Celtic vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,572,718 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 37.0 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,193 compared to $99,933, a difference of 20.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $110,787, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $116,566, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $67,594, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $56,379, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.1%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 21.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 24.3%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.97%), family households (63.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 48.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.47%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.1%).