Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,615,942 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.279% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 279.2 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $110,787, a difference of 28.0%), per capita income ($40,339 compared to $49,741, a difference of 23.3%), and median male earnings ($51,310 compared to $63,240, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,294 compared to $44,198, a difference of 12.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,174 compared to $56,379, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,942 compared to $67,594, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 33.1%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 32.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.7%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.9%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 32.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 0.79%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.9%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.2%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.8%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.0%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.0%).