Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,320,496 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.075% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 75.2 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,114 compared to $118,291, a difference of 24.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $116,566, a difference of 24.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $67,594, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $56,379, a difference of 4.6%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $44,198, a difference of 13.0%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 50.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 38.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.1%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.4%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.5%), family households (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 109.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 51.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 14.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 34.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 44.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 66.3%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.5%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.6%).