Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,514,355 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 3.459% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to a decrease of 3,459.4 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 11.4%), per capita income ($54,202 compared to $49,741, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $67,594, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($63,382 compared to $63,240, a difference of 0.22%), median family income ($119,262 compared to $118,291, a difference of 0.82%), and median earnings ($54,290 compared to $53,310, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 18.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.68%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.2%), family households with children (24.8% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.8%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (46.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 60.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 53.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 42.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.6%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.3%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.3%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.92%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.8%).