Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,365,106 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.610. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.514% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to a decrease of 513.8 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($49,215 compared to $63,240, a difference of 28.5%), median family income ($92,231 compared to $118,291, a difference of 28.2%), and per capita income ($39,372 compared to $49,741, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $56,379, a difference of 5.8%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and median female earnings ($36,904 compared to $44,198, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 63.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 41.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 36.7%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (67.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.43%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 61.8%), master's degree (12.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 47.7%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.25%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.0%).