Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,652,953 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.235. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.163% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to a decrease of 162.6 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,876 compared to $110,787, a difference of 19.3%), median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $63,240, a difference of 18.8%), and median household income ($85,054 compared to $99,933, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $56,379, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $44,198, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.63%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 24.5%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.21%), family households (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.1%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.43%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%).