Mongolian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,730,669 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.199% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 198.6 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $44,595, a difference of 10.3%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $38,992, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $51,421, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $61,244, a difference of 6.7%), and median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $56,546, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 24.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.80%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.9%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.14%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (62.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 90.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.2%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.9%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.1%).