Immigrants from Fiji vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,864,164 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.616. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.073% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 72.9 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 30.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $51,421, a difference of 11.0%), and median household income ($93,933 compared to $86,164, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,544 compared to $105,839, a difference of 0.67%), median earnings ($48,305 compared to $47,221, a difference of 2.3%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $56,546, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.7%), receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 31.6%), and single father poverty (13.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.23%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 36.1%), male unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.0%), and female unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.9%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.11, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 2.5%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Czech communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 135.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.9%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.0%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.5%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.17%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.98%).