Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Czechs

Excellent
Excellent
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,413,784 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.832. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.501% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 1,500.5 Czechs.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Czech Communities

Difference between Czech Ancestry and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

While Czech ancestry and immigrants from Czechoslovakia may have similarities, there are subtle differences that set them apart.

Czech Ancestry

Czech ancestry refers to a person's genetic, cultural, and historical connection to Czechoslovakia through their family lineage. This means that the person has Czech heritage and is likely to share some characteristics and cultural traits that are associated with Czechoslovakia, such as language, customs, and traditions. It is possible to have Czech ancestry without being an immigrant from Czechoslovakia.

Immigrant from Czechoslovakia

On the other hand, an immigrant from Czechoslovakia is a person who has moved from Czechoslovakia to the United States, with the intention of settling there. This person has left their country of origin and has become a citizen or resident of the United States. An immigrant from Czechoslovakia may or may not have Czech ancestry, and their cultural background and identity may be influenced by a combination of their Czech heritage and the culture of the United States.

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $44,595, a difference of 16.1%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $38,992, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $47,221, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $51,421, a difference of 5.7%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $103,507, a difference of 8.1%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaCzech
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
29.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 14.0%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.77%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaCzech
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaCzech
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.59%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.9%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaCzech
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Excellent
30.5%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 71.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 21.8%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaCzech
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.1%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.9%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaCzech
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaCzech
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%