Native Hawaiian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,047,556 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $61,244, a difference of 16.0%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and per capita income ($41,017 compared to $44,595, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($104,910 compared to $105,839, a difference of 0.89%), median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $38,992, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $96,525, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 39.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.4%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 12.4%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.11, a difference of 10.3%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.47%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.7%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 0.11%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 20.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.3%).