Navajo vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Navajo

Czechs

Poor
Excellent
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Navajo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,492,147 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 4.2 Czechs.
Navajo Integration in Czech Communities

Navajo vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $44,595, a difference of 53.6%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $105,839, a difference of 49.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $103,507, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $38,992, a difference of 18.0%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $51,421, a difference of 21.3%), and median earnings ($36,999 compared to $47,221, a difference of 27.6%).
Navajo vs Czech Income
Income MetricNavajoCzech
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,031
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Tragic
$70,989
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Tragic
$59,159
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,999
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,098
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,046
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$42,380
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$66,529
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$69,759
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$47,722
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
29.2%

Navajo vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 194.7%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 153.7%), and receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 128.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 39.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 48.5%), and single female poverty (31.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 50.4%).
Navajo vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricNavajoCzech
Poverty
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
30.3%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.3%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Tragic
31.7%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
40.2%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
9.2%

Navajo vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 125.2%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 117.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 110.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 39.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.8%).
Navajo vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNavajoCzech
Unemployment
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.5%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
4.7%

Navajo vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 36.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 15.5%).
Navajo vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNavajoCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.6%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.1%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
64.8%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.9%

Navajo vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 68.7%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 56.6%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.53%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (66.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Navajo vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNavajoCzech
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.65
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Excellent
30.5%

Navajo vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 37.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.96%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 11.1%).
Navajo vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNavajoCzech
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.4%

Navajo vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czech communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 60.9%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 56.2%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.62%).
Navajo vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricNavajoCzech
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.1%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.3%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.8%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.6%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.4%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Navajo vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czech communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 48.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.6%).
Navajo vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricNavajoCzech
Disability
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.3%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%