Kiowa vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Kiowa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Kiowa

Czechs

Poor
Excellent
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Kiowa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,228,817 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to a decrease of 15.4 Czechs.
Kiowa Integration in Czech Communities

Kiowa vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $103,507, a difference of 38.4%), median family income ($80,885 compared to $105,839, a difference of 30.8%), and median household income ($65,914 compared to $86,164, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $38,992, a difference of 14.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $51,421, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,140 compared to $61,244, a difference of 19.8%).
Kiowa vs Czech Income
Income MetricKiowaCzech
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,102
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Tragic
$80,885
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Tragic
$65,914
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,232
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,094
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,074
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,733
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,776
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$74,815
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,140
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
29.2%

Kiowa vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 67.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 65.3%), and family poverty (12.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 65.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.9%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and single female poverty (26.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 28.0%).
Kiowa vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricKiowaCzech
Poverty
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
29.2%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Tragic
26.9%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.5%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
9.2%

Kiowa vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 63.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Kiowa vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricKiowaCzech
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%

Kiowa vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 7.1%).
Kiowa vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricKiowaCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.4%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.8%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
83.9%

Kiowa vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 41.3%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (61.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.11, a difference of 5.2%).
Kiowa vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricKiowaCzech
Family Households
Tragic
61.4%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.5%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
43.1%
Excellent
30.5%

Kiowa vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 67.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.4%).
Kiowa vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricKiowaCzech
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.5%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.4%

Kiowa vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.9%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 36.0%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
Kiowa vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricKiowaCzech
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.0%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.8%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Kiowa vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czech communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 53.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.2%).
Kiowa vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricKiowaCzech
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.4%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.2%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%