Hawaiian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,972,860 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 8.3 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 17.3%), per capita income ($39,403 compared to $44,595, a difference of 13.2%), and median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $56,546, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,729 compared to $86,164, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $51,421, a difference of 3.2%), and median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $38,992, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 40.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.58%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.8%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.11, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.6%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.0%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.7%), male disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability (12.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.8%).