Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Malaysia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Malaysia

Czechs

Good
Excellent
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Immigrants from Malaysia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,818,109 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.326% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 326.4 Czechs.
Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Czech Communities

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $38,992, a difference of 12.4%), per capita income ($49,983 compared to $44,595, a difference of 12.1%), and median household income ($96,292 compared to $86,164, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $51,421, a difference of 5.4%), householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $61,244, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $103,507, a difference of 9.0%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Income
Income MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaCzech
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,983
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,880
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,292
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,514
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,121
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,835
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,179
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,650
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,796
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,497
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
29.2%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 27.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.39%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaCzech
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaCzech
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.4%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.76%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.3%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.9%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.3%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.22%), family households (64.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaCzech
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Excellent
30.5%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 97.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 23.1%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaCzech
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.5%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.8%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.8%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.94%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaCzech
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.3%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.3%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.5%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.0%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.9%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.7%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaCzech
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.4%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%