Australian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,931,921 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.130% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 130.5 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $44,595, a difference of 16.8%), median household income ($96,490 compared to $86,164, a difference of 12.0%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $105,839, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $51,421, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $61,244, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.23%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.4%), currently married (47.6% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.76%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 46.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 34.6%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.0%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.040%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.8%).