Lumbee vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lumbee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lumbee

Czechs

Poor
Excellent
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Lumbee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,692,317 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to an increase of 41.5 Czechs.
Lumbee Integration in Czech Communities

Lumbee vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $96,525, a difference of 60.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $103,507, a difference of 59.0%), and median household income ($54,644 compared to $86,164, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $38,992, a difference of 20.0%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $47,221, a difference of 28.1%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $56,546, a difference of 35.5%).
Lumbee vs Czech Income
Income MetricLumbeeCzech
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,845
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Tragic
$68,679
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Tragic
$54,644
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,876
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,715
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,500
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$34,584
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$60,305
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$65,113
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$40,550
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.3%
Tragic
29.2%

Lumbee vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 148.6%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 129.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 125.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 49.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 52.2%), and single female poverty (33.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 56.8%).
Lumbee vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricLumbeeCzech
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.1%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.7%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Tragic
33.0%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
28.5%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.2%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
9.2%

Lumbee vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 82.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 81.6%), and male unemployment (6.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.8%).
Lumbee vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLumbeeCzech
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.8%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.7%

Lumbee vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 40.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 19.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 10.8%).
Lumbee vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLumbeeCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.8%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.6%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
65.5%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.6%
Exceptional
83.9%

Lumbee vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 61.2%), births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 57.9%), and currently married (39.8% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.5%).
Lumbee vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLumbeeCzech
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.6%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.8%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
48.2%
Excellent
30.5%

Lumbee vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 50.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 10.0%).
Lumbee vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLumbeeCzech
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.9%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.1%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

Lumbee vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 77.6%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 73.3%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
Lumbee vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricLumbeeCzech
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.2%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.9%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.1%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.8%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.3%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.5%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.1%
Good
1.9%

Lumbee vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.9%), ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 59.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.0%).
Lumbee vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricLumbeeCzech
Disability
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.6%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.7%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.4%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
9.5%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%