Pakistani vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pakistani
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pakistanis

Czechs

Good
Excellent
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Pakistani Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 314,704,168 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Pakistani communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.655. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pakistanis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.549% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pakistanis corresponds to an increase of 548.5 Czechs.
Pakistani Integration in Czech Communities

Pakistani vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 12.0%), householder income over 65 years ($63,844 compared to $61,244, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($40,596 compared to $38,992, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,719 compared to $56,546, a difference of 0.31%), median family income ($107,390 compared to $105,839, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,317 compared to $103,507, a difference of 1.8%).
Pakistani vs Czech Income
Income MetricPakistaniCzech
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,587
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,390
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,638
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,254
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,719
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,596
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,325
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,401
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,317
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,844
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.1%
Tragic
29.2%

Pakistani vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.43%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
Pakistani vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricPakistaniCzech
Poverty
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.2%

Pakistani vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.8%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.0%).
Pakistani vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPakistaniCzech
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%

Pakistani vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.93%).
Pakistani vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPakistaniCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.6%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.7%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
83.9%

Pakistani vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.7%), currently married (47.2% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.15%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and family households (64.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
Pakistani vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPakistaniCzech
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Excellent
30.5%

Pakistani vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.2%).
Pakistani vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPakistaniCzech
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.4%

Pakistani vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.1%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (67.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.66%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Pakistani vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricPakistaniCzech
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.4%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.5%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.1%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.7%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
1.9%

Pakistani vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.1%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), female disability (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Pakistani vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricPakistaniCzech
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.2%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%