Immigrants vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,427,373 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.815. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 7.9 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 16.1%), median family income ($100,962 compared to $105,839, a difference of 4.8%), and median male earnings ($54,168 compared to $56,546, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($85,818 compared to $86,164, a difference of 0.40%), median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $38,992, a difference of 0.86%), and median earnings ($46,478 compared to $47,221, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 49.9%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 41.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czech communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.3%), currently married (45.8% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.11, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 69.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 86.9%), college, under 1 year (62.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and high school diploma (85.8% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.26%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.39%), female disability (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.9%).