Latvian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,452,288 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.221% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 220.8 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $44,595, a difference of 18.1%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $105,839, a difference of 13.7%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $86,164, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,421, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $61,244, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 10.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.1%), male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.5%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.12%), family households (62.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 42.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.8%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.5%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.5%).