Ethiopian vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ethiopian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ethiopians

Czechs

Good
Excellent
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Ethiopian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,177,090 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to a decrease of 17.0 Czechs.
Ethiopian Integration in Czech Communities

Ethiopian vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 33.6%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $38,992, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $61,244, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,736 compared to $103,507, a difference of 0.22%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $96,525, a difference of 0.31%), and median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $56,546, a difference of 0.54%).
Ethiopian vs Czech Income
Income MetricEthiopianCzech
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,569
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,251
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,640
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,572
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,243
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,243
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,818
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,824
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,736
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,989
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
29.2%

Ethiopian vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.9%), single father poverty (13.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 25.3%), and single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Ethiopian vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricEthiopianCzech
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Average
11.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.2%

Ethiopian vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.3%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Ethiopian vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEthiopianCzech
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%

Ethiopian vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Ethiopian vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEthiopianCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
69.3%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
82.0%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.2%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.9%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
83.9%

Ethiopian vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.0%), married-couple households (43.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.31%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Ethiopian vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEthiopianCzech
Family Households
Tragic
61.2%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.5%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.0%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Excellent
30.5%

Ethiopian vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 52.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 25.8%).
Ethiopian vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEthiopianCzech
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.5%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.1%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

Ethiopian vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Ethiopian vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricEthiopianCzech
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Poor
92.2%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Fair
89.0%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.0%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.4%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.8%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.0%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
1.9%

Ethiopian vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.8%), and male disability (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Ethiopian vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricEthiopianCzech
Disability
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%