Brazilian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 302,735,676 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 9.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $51,421, a difference of 5.7%), and per capita income ($46,700 compared to $44,595, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $61,244, a difference of 0.36%), median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $56,546, a difference of 0.52%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $103,507, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 24.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.6%), currently married (46.4% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.40%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and family households (63.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 50.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 36.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.2%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (60.5% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.35%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.8%).