Icelander vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,947,603 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 86.1 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 6.2%), median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $56,546, a difference of 2.0%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $105,839, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $61,244, a difference of 0.040%), median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $38,992, a difference of 0.30%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $51,421, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 16.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.2%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.9%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.0%), currently married (47.3% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 39.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.46%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.9%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.67%), female disability (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.83%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.92%).