Blackfeet vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,491,562 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 17.9 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $103,507, a difference of 19.5%), median family income ($88,717 compared to $105,839, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $96,525, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $51,421, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $38,992, a difference of 8.7%), and median earnings ($41,822 compared to $47,221, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 54.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 53.3%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.1%), single male poverty (15.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 34.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.5%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.25%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 39.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czech communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.8%).