Tohono O'odham vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Czechs

Tragic
Excellent
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,418,592 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 29.2 Czechs.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Czech Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $44,595, a difference of 47.4%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $105,839, a difference of 46.6%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $56,546, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,421, a difference of 13.6%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $38,992, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $61,244, a difference of 24.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Czech Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamCzech
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
29.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 179.0%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 175.1%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 133.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.7%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 48.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 51.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamCzech
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Czech communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 124.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 113.3%), and unemployment (8.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 104.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamCzech
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 39.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 11.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 65.1%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 63.3%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamCzech
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Excellent
30.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 127.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 10.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamCzech
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Czech communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 55.6%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.9%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
Tohono O'odham vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamCzech
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 60.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 48.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamCzech
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%