Marshallese vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,152,441 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Marshallese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.759. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Marshallese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Marshallese corresponds to an increase of 53.0 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 24.5%), median male earnings ($48,137 compared to $56,546, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,575 compared to $96,525, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,627 compared to $51,421, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($36,459 compared to $38,992, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,874 compared to $61,244, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 52.8%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.32%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 44.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 42.3%), and unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 13.9%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.50%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 42.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.3%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 65.5%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.1%).