Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 431,456,138 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Northern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.814. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.107% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Europe corresponds to an increase of 107.2 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,159 compared to $44,595, a difference of 21.4%), median household income ($99,813 compared to $86,164, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($111,676 compared to $96,525, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,571 compared to $51,421, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,003 compared to $61,244, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.41%), male poverty (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.56%), family households (63.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 54.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.0%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.3%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (91.4% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%).