Houma vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,801,737 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.053% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 53.5 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $103,507, a difference of 43.6%), median family income ($76,188 compared to $105,839, a difference of 38.9%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $86,164, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $56,546, a difference of 11.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $51,421, a difference of 15.9%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $47,221, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Czech communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 97.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 85.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (24.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 28.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 46.3%), and single mother poverty (43.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 50.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 89.0%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.1%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 52.5%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.4%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 66.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 49.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 40.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 97.3%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 97.0%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 86.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 65.6%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 63.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.5%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.4%).