Ecuadorian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 292,705,882 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 23.3 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 27.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,244, a difference of 11.4%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $105,839, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $38,992, a difference of 0.32%), median earnings ($45,214 compared to $47,221, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $51,421, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 61.8%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 61.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 42.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 39.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.5%), currently married (43.6% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.78%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 230.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 64.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 19.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 46.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 60.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 98.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.8%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 40.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%), female disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.8%).