Ugandan vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ugandans

Czechs

Average
Excellent
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Ugandan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,255,709 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Czechs.
Ugandan Integration in Czech Communities

Ugandan vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 21.3%), median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $38,992, a difference of 4.9%), and median male earnings ($55,290 compared to $56,546, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $103,507, a difference of 0.030%), householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $61,244, a difference of 0.11%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,667 compared to $96,525, a difference of 0.15%).
Ugandan vs Czech Income
Income MetricUgandanCzech
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,047
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,541
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,557
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,854
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,290
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,889
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,923
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,667
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,472
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,177
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.1%
Tragic
29.2%

Ugandan vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 32.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 32.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.19%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Ugandan vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricUgandanCzech
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Fair
9.3%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.1%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.4%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.3%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Good
28.8%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.2%
Exceptional
9.2%

Ugandan vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Ugandan vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUgandanCzech
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%

Ugandan vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Ugandan vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUgandanCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.4%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.6%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.4%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Exceptional
83.9%

Ugandan vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.0%), married-couple households (43.8% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Ugandan vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUgandanCzech
Family Households
Tragic
61.7%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.8%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.2%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.1%
Excellent
30.5%

Ugandan vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 66.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 26.6%).
Ugandan vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUgandanCzech
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.5%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.4%

Ugandan vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.9%), and professional degree (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (66.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.61%).
Ugandan vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricUgandanCzech
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Average
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Average
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.0%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.1%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.2%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.1%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
1.9%

Ugandan vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.34%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Ugandan vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricUgandanCzech
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%