Immigrants from Micronesia vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,563,156 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 18.4 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $56,546, a difference of 19.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $96,525, a difference of 19.8%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $61,244, a difference of 0.40%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $51,421, a difference of 1.4%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $38,992, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 46.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 36.5%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.8%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 46.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.1%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.2%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 3.3%).