French American Indian vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

French American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

French American Indians

Czechs

Poor
Excellent
1,780
SOCIAL INDEX
15.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
288th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in French American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,538,253 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.130% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 129.7 Czechs.
French American Indian Integration in Czech Communities

French American Indian vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $103,507, a difference of 15.2%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and median family income ($92,872 compared to $105,839, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $51,421, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $38,992, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($43,333 compared to $47,221, a difference of 9.0%).
French American Indian vs Czech Income
Income MetricFrench American IndianCzech
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,244
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,872
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,387
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,333
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,611
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,920
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,977
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,899
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$89,811
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,699
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.4%
Tragic
29.2%

French American Indian vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 46.2%), family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and single male poverty (15.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.5%).
French American Indian vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricFrench American IndianCzech
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.3%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Tragic
24.6%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.1%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.2%

French American Indian vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 32.7%), male unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.1%).
French American Indian vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFrench American IndianCzech
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.2%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.7%

French American Indian vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
French American Indian vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFrench American IndianCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.8%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.8%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
83.9%

French American Indian vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.7%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 19.9%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.8%), family households (62.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
French American Indian vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFrench American IndianCzech
Family Households
Tragic
62.4%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.20
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.6%
Excellent
30.5%

French American Indian vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 51.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 10.8%).
French American Indian vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFrench American IndianCzech
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.8%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

French American Indian vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
French American Indian vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricFrench American IndianCzech
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.7%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.4%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.0%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.1%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.7%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.9%

French American Indian vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 21.4%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.1%).
French American Indian vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricFrench American IndianCzech
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
13.7%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.7%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%