Asian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,336,522 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.800. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 5.8 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $86,164, a difference of 18.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $96,525, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $103,507, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $51,421, a difference of 10.9%), and per capita income ($50,057 compared to $44,595, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.9%), single father poverty (14.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.42%), poverty (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and male poverty (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.6%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 14.0%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.5% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 0.090%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 60.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.8%).