Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,944,937 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.457. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 6.3 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $96,525, a difference of 22.3%), median household income ($104,796 compared to $86,164, a difference of 21.6%), and per capita income ($53,806 compared to $44,595, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $51,421, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $61,244, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 36.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.6%), births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 21.9%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.47%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and married-couple households (48.8% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 96.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.4%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.0%), and professional degree (6.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.75%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.8%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.82%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.5%).