Immigrants from Austria vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,541,664 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Austria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Austria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Austria corresponds to an increase of 84.6 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,503 compared to $44,595, a difference of 17.7%), householder income over 65 years ($68,208 compared to $61,244, a difference of 11.4%), and median household income ($95,277 compared to $86,164, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,400 compared to $51,421, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,140 compared to $103,507, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 11.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.8%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and family households with children (25.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.21%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and family households (63.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 48.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 37.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.3%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.40%), cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%).