Egyptian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,985,528 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to a decrease of 11.9 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($43,305 compared to $38,992, a difference of 11.1%), median household income ($95,673 compared to $86,164, a difference of 11.0%), and wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,444 compared to $51,421, a difference of 5.9%), householder income over 65 years ($65,441 compared to $61,244, a difference of 6.9%), and median family income ($114,119 compared to $105,839, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.5%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.0%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.0%), births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 72.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and master's degree (17.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.8%).