Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Armenia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Armenia

Czechs

Fair
Excellent
3,337
SOCIAL INDEX
30.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
226th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Immigrants from Armenia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,956,285 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Armenia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Armenia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Armenia corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Czechs.
Immigrants from Armenia Integration in Czech Communities

Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 40.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,974 compared to $61,244, a difference of 13.5%), and median male earnings ($51,793 compared to $56,546, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,552 compared to $44,595, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,867 compared to $96,525, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($46,094 compared to $47,221, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaCzech
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,552
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,605
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,555
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Fair
$46,094
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,793
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,340
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,986
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$94,867
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,863
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,974
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.7%
Tragic
29.2%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 76.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaCzech
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.7%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 61.2%), unemployment (7.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 61.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 28.4%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaCzech
Unemployment
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.7%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 50.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.7% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.7%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.9%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 17.1%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.11, a difference of 7.7%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaCzech
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.6%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.3%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.1%
Excellent
30.5%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 53.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 15.4%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaCzech
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.6%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.4%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 124.2%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and high school diploma (85.2% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.42%), college, 1 year or more (60.0% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaCzech
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.8%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.0%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.4%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.76% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 105.0%), self-care disability (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 82.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.4%), disability (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaCzech
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.76%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.3%