Osage vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,924,650 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.818. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.242% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 241.9 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 16.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $52,450, a difference of 14.6%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $83,304, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,568 compared to $40,434, a difference of 2.2%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $51,594, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $57,580, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 30.2%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 29.5%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.6%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 99.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and high school diploma (89.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.56%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.3%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 38.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 0.36%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.7%).