Osage vs Austrian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,316,195 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.720. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Austrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 30.2 Austrians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $108,692, a difference of 23.0%), per capita income ($39,568 compared to $48,116, a difference of 21.6%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $91,339, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $51,898, a difference of 13.4%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $40,923, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.10%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 39.4%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 33.1%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.3%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 8.4%).