Osage vs Colville Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,576,559 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Colville within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.101% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 101.3 Colville.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Colville communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 27.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $49,774, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $51,739, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($42,651 compared to $42,151, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $82,604, a difference of 2.2%), and median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $48,516, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Colville communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 56.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.6%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 76.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 68.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Colville communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 41.3%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 33.2%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.93%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Colville communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 57.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 43.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Colville communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 13.9%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 79.7%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and female disability (14.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 5.4%).