Osage vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,130,613 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 56.3 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $112,484, a difference of 27.3%), median family income ($91,926 compared to $115,395, a difference of 25.5%), and per capita income ($39,568 compared to $49,448, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.2%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $42,108, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $53,552, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.5%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 35.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.5%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.2%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.48%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.33%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 45.5%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 41.2%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 34.1%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.0%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 10.5%).